Drupal Engineering
Build and modernize scalable Drupal platforms
When You Need This
Case Study Spotlight
SEMI | Drupal DXP
How We Unified 1.3 Million SEMI Members on One Drupal DXP
Experience Design
Making complex sites intuitive and action-driven
When You Need This
Visibility
Improve findability and relevance across your platform
Our Services
When You Need This
Support
Ongoing help from Drupal experts who know your stack
When You Need This
Our Work
See the impact we've made
Company
Everything about Specbee: our story, our people, our thinking
Interviewing, testing, and validating your design early is cheaper than rebuilding late. Our UX research services find the problems while they still cost a conversation to fix.
Every redesign carries someone's opinion about what users want. Most of those opinions never get tested until the site is already live, and by then, the fix costs a rebuild, not a revision.
That's usually when teams call in a dedicated UX Research agency like Specbee instead of leaving it to internal guesswork.
Give us a call when:
A redesign is being planned on internal opinions, with no user evidence behind it.
Support tickets and drop-off rates keep pointing to the same friction, and nobody knows why.
A technical or specialized audience needs a faster path to complex information.
Stakeholders disagree on design direction and need real data to settle it.
A product is about to launch and no one has tested it with real users yet
Six ways our UX Research company finds out what's actually true about your users. Every study is run and reviewed by senior researchers.
Competitor analysis, user profiling, and stakeholder interviews, run before a single wireframe exists.
Card sorting, surveys, and usability testing on real prototypes, so decisions get tested before they get built.
Post-launch surveys and behavioral data that check the redesign against what it was supposed to fix.
One-on-one conversations and in-context observation, run in person or remote, with real target users.
WCAG-guided testing across user types, so the product works for everyone who has to use it.
Findings translated into information architecture, content hierarchy, and decisions your team can act on.
A UX Research report that sits in a shared drive doesn't change anything. The insights only earn their cost once they shape a wireframe, a build, or a piece of content.
So we keep research connected to the disciplines that act on it, in-house, with the same team and the same context.
Research findings turn into wireframes and prototypes fastest when the same team runs both.
A validated design still needs to be built right. We hand off directly into front-end implementation.
Content hierarchy and information architecture shape search performance. Our SEO team turns research-led structure into rankings.
Usability doesn't stay fixed. We re-test after launch to catch what changes.
Research-backed design earns its cost back in specific, countable ways.
Catch the wrong direction before development starts, while it's still cheap to change.
Real user data ends opinion debates fast.
Master Bond's UX research-led redesign drove a 64% increase in lead-intent user activity.
WCAG-guided testing is part of the process from the start.
Findings get documented, so design choices can be explained later.
Clear, validated requirements mean less back-and-forth between design and engineering mid-build.
Trusted by the world's leading teams
From the first research question to the final report, the process stays consistent, whether the study runs two weeks or two months. Senior researchers run every stage, so what reaches your design team is evidence, weighed and interpreted by people.
We clarify your research goals and define target user profiles, reviewing your existing analytics, support tickets, and past research to decide where to look first. A senior researcher signs off on the research plan before recruitment starts.
We recruit real users who match the profiles we defined, not convenient stand-ins. Logistics, screener questions, and session structure get planned around your timeline, whether sessions run in person or remote.
Real users interact with your product while we observe, whether that's an interview, a usability test, or a card sort. Every session is recorded and logged, so analysis works from evidence rather than memory.
Senior researchers review every session, find the patterns, discard the noise, and turn what's left into a report your design and development teams can act on.
Your last redesign was based on stakeholder opinions, not user testing.
Conversion or engagement metrics dropped after a design change and nobody knows why.
Your audience includes highly technical or specialized users the design team doesn't fully understand.
A big redesign or replatform is coming and the risk of getting it wrong is high.
Accessibility has never been formally tested with real users.
We build Drupal platforms for organizations where performance, compliance, and scalability aren't optional.
Reliability and security — streamlined UX while keeping data compliant.
High-volume publishing platforms that scale with your content and your audience.
#01
A UX research-led redesign that rebuilt product discovery around how engineers search.
#02
A previous migration's bug backlog cleared first, then a mission-led rebuild on deadline.
#03
A custom Drupal theme that stands out while staying true to GT's brand system.
#04
One Drupal platform with a shared component library that regional teams run themselves.
Research is only half the job. As a ux research company that also builds, we take findings straight into the platforms our research-led designs get built on. Our engineers contribute modules, patches, and core fixes back to those same platforms.
130+
Module Contributions
Modules built and maintained for real-world enterprise needs.
10
Events Sponsored
Actively sponsoring DrupalCon and regional Drupal Camps.
GOLD
Drupal Partner
Proud Gold certified partners supporting the sustainability of open source.
500+
Published Drupal resources
Some agencies gate their knowledge. Ours ranks on Google.
A single round of usability testing or a full strategy-to-launch program: we'll scope it to your product, your timeline, and your budget.
Have a Question? Write to us - [email protected]
Quick Contact - Talk to a UX Research Expert
An engineer reviews every request. You'll hear back within a few hours.
Find answers to common questions about UX Research services.
Cost depends on scope: a handful of interviews costs far less than a multi-phase study spanning strategy, design, and launch. Specbee's mix-and-match model means you pay for research alone if that's all you need, instead of a bundled package. Most standalone engagements start with a scoped discovery call, so pricing reflects your actual project.
A single ux research service round, discovery, recruitment, fieldwork, and reporting, typically runs 3 to 6 weeks depending on how many participants and methods are involved. Larger, multi-phase studies, like the one behind Master Bond's redesign, run alongside the full length of the project.
Usability testing with 5 to 8 users per round typically surfaces most usability issues in a specific flow. Larger quantitative studies, like surveys, need bigger sample sizes to be statistically meaningful. We scope participant numbers to the method every time.
Usability testing is one method inside a broader experience design research service, not the whole discipline. Research also includes interviews, card sorting, surveys, and contextual inquiry, used at different points from early strategy to post-launch measurement.
Both. Master Bond's redesign combined in-person and remote sessions, recruiting participants through the client's internal network and a third-party agency to reach a broad, representative sample.
Yes. WCAG-guided testing with real users, including those relying on assistive technology, catches accessibility gaps automated scanners miss. It was part of the research process behind Master Bond's redesign.
Results vary by project, but Master Bond's UX research-driven redesign drove a 64% increase in lead-intent user activity and a 92.5% increase in overall active users. Research doesn't guarantee a specific number. It replaces guessing with evidence before launch.
